A science administrator is evaluating three research proposals for funding. The first proposal requires $450,000 over 3 years, the second $720,000 over 4 years, and the third $210,000 over 2 years. If the administrator plans to allocate equal yearly funding across all proposals, what is the maximum annual budget that can be sustainably funded for all three projects combined?

In an era defined by competitive innovation and strategic investment, science administrators face growing pressure to optimize limited resources while supporting high-impact research. As federal and private funders increasingly prioritize measurable outcomes, transparent decision-making becomes essential. When evaluating multiple research avenues, aligning annual funding ensures stability and fairness—key factors in sustaining robust scientific progress. Understanding how to balance competing demands reveals deeper insights into modern research finance.

This proposal requires precise allocation: the administrator must determine a sustainable annual budget that fairly covers all three projects without exceeding available resources. The first proposal spans 3 years, the second 4, and the third only 2—but equal yearly funding demands a uniform commitment across the full duration of each. The core challenge lies in calculating the maximum annual contribution that supports each proposal for their full planning horizon.

Understanding the Context


The Math Behind Sustainable Annual Funding

A science administrator assessing three distinct research initiatives with different timeframes must determine a consistent annual budget that supports all proposals over their respective lifespans. The goal is not to find a compromise per project, but a single sustainable funding level that covers each at its full duration—ensuring no project is prematurely cut short due to budget constraints.

To calculate the maximum annual total budget:

  1. Identify each proposal’s total funding required and its funding period.
  2. Sum the full duration costs (in partial years) but treat them as baseline annual equivalents.
  3. The equal annual